<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More From the Mine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ihaspc.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ihaspc.com/?p=535</link>
	<description>You has too?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:33:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris F</title>
		<link>http://ihaspc.com/?p=535&#038;cpage=1#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ihaspc.com/?p=535#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>@Tesh: I am surprised Druids aren&#039;t the highest, of utility is the sole factor. They can Tank, Melee DPS, Range DPS, and Heal - all FOUR class types wrapped up into one class. And each form does it just as well as a single serving class.

Although, Druids and Shamans were always tied for &quot;last&quot; in the popularity contest. At level 70 ~7% played them. Level 80 they have seen a resurgence.

I suspect that has to do with race limitations, as well as previously being the red-headed step child of WoW. They used to suck so bad in Vanilla UNLESS you were healing, and only then you were really only wanted to raid for one ability: Innervate. One trick pony-syndrome segregated the class even further from the playerbase</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tesh: I am surprised Druids aren&#8217;t the highest, of utility is the sole factor. They can Tank, Melee DPS, Range DPS, and Heal &#8211; all FOUR class types wrapped up into one class. And each form does it just as well as a single serving class.</p>
<p>Although, Druids and Shamans were always tied for &#8220;last&#8221; in the popularity contest. At level 70 ~7% played them. Level 80 they have seen a resurgence.</p>
<p>I suspect that has to do with race limitations, as well as previously being the red-headed step child of WoW. They used to suck so bad in Vanilla UNLESS you were healing, and only then you were really only wanted to raid for one ability: Innervate. One trick pony-syndrome segregated the class even further from the playerbase</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F</title>
		<link>http://ihaspc.com/?p=535&#038;cpage=1#comment-1059</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ihaspc.com/?p=535#comment-1059</guid>
		<description>Paladins were always super boring - I only got one to 24 before I preferred clipping my toenails (which I was able to do while playing a Paladin, oddly enough).

I think their popularity was the change in 5 mans mostly. CC disappeared from WoW, and all Heroics/5 Mans are basically done by inserting a Paladin tank, gathering up all mobs, and AOE&#039;ing them all dead. So they shine in AOE tanking and Main Tank healing (making them raid-necessary) so two very popular wow time sinks covered all nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paladins were always super boring &#8211; I only got one to 24 before I preferred clipping my toenails (which I was able to do while playing a Paladin, oddly enough).</p>
<p>I think their popularity was the change in 5 mans mostly. CC disappeared from WoW, and all Heroics/5 Mans are basically done by inserting a Paladin tank, gathering up all mobs, and AOE&#8217;ing them all dead. So they shine in AOE tanking and Main Tank healing (making them raid-necessary) so two very popular wow time sinks covered all nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yeebo</title>
		<link>http://ihaspc.com/?p=535&#038;cpage=1#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ihaspc.com/?p=535#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m shocked that Paladin is so high. I wonder that that reflects?  Better endgame ulility than most classes?  

They always kind of bored me to tears, personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m shocked that Paladin is so high. I wonder that that reflects?  Better endgame ulility than most classes?  </p>
<p>They always kind of bored me to tears, personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tesh</title>
		<link>http://ihaspc.com/?p=535&#038;cpage=1#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>Tesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ihaspc.com/?p=535#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>The mean and median are close enough to the presumed goal of 10% apiece.  That&#039;s close enough for government work, as my relatives love to say.

(Never mind that the mean *is* the target, and any sample that assumes 100% of the player base is represented will spit out a perfect 10% mean.  That&#039;s just gravy; you hit the target!  Special is you!)

The data is interesting to me.  I&#039;d expect DKs to be high on the list as new shinies, but the Paladin and Druid are more significant, methinketh.  I see that as an indicator that people like flexibility in their character.  That Paladins are above Druids bolster that notion, as they have access to Plate armor, another layer of flexibility.  They can use more gear... and have pretty exclusive claim on non-Protection Plate gear.

Then again, I&#039;m probably biased, since I keep harping on flexibility and choice whenever I get all game designery.  Still, the data can easily support this notion... though the Mage (DPS) and Shaman (Hybrid) don&#039;t quite fit that notion.  *shrug*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mean and median are close enough to the presumed goal of 10% apiece.  That&#8217;s close enough for government work, as my relatives love to say.</p>
<p>(Never mind that the mean *is* the target, and any sample that assumes 100% of the player base is represented will spit out a perfect 10% mean.  That&#8217;s just gravy; you hit the target!  Special is you!)</p>
<p>The data is interesting to me.  I&#8217;d expect DKs to be high on the list as new shinies, but the Paladin and Druid are more significant, methinketh.  I see that as an indicator that people like flexibility in their character.  That Paladins are above Druids bolster that notion, as they have access to Plate armor, another layer of flexibility.  They can use more gear&#8230; and have pretty exclusive claim on non-Protection Plate gear.</p>
<p>Then again, I&#8217;m probably biased, since I keep harping on flexibility and choice whenever I get all game designery.  Still, the data can easily support this notion&#8230; though the Mage (DPS) and Shaman (Hybrid) don&#8217;t quite fit that notion.  *shrug*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F</title>
		<link>http://ihaspc.com/?p=535&#038;cpage=1#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 02:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ihaspc.com/?p=535#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>Very true =) Although I was leaning to just ditching the 50% of the sample size which doesn&#039;t line up with what the ideal results are - isn&#039;t that how most professionals run their tests/studies these days? I suppose it is who is behind the funding! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true =) Although I was leaning to just ditching the 50% of the sample size which doesn&#8217;t line up with what the ideal results are &#8211; isn&#8217;t that how most professionals run their tests/studies these days? I suppose it is who is behind the funding! <img src='http://ihaspc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zubon</title>
		<link>http://ihaspc.com/?p=535&#038;cpage=1#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Zubon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 02:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ihaspc.com/?p=535#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It’s actually not a bad spread, when you take out the top 2 and bottom 3.&lt;/em&gt;
Just to comment from professional work: that is not a good statistical method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>It’s actually not a bad spread, when you take out the top 2 and bottom 3.</em><br />
Just to comment from professional work: that is not a good statistical method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F</title>
		<link>http://ihaspc.com/?p=535&#038;cpage=1#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 02:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ihaspc.com/?p=535#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>It could definitely appear that way - Every class but Mage/Rogue/Warlock/Hunter can currently serve two functions (in PVE, at least). Dual specs just pushes people towards more &quot;purpose&quot;, especially since every class, if specced properly, can do even DPS.

Thanks for stopping by - love your work =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could definitely appear that way &#8211; Every class but Mage/Rogue/Warlock/Hunter can currently serve two functions (in PVE, at least). Dual specs just pushes people towards more &#8220;purpose&#8221;, especially since every class, if specced properly, can do even DPS.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by &#8211; love your work =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zardoz</title>
		<link>http://ihaspc.com/?p=535&#038;cpage=1#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>Zardoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 23:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ihaspc.com/?p=535#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>Always happy to meet another person who loves their data.

In this case, I can&#039;t make up my mind whether these numbers represent a bug or a feature. Blizz have shown that they&#039;re prepared to depreciate the past - maybe the pure DPS class is being written out of the game and they&#039;re hoping nobody notices...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always happy to meet another person who loves their data.</p>
<p>In this case, I can&#8217;t make up my mind whether these numbers represent a bug or a feature. Blizz have shown that they&#8217;re prepared to depreciate the past &#8211; maybe the pure DPS class is being written out of the game and they&#8217;re hoping nobody notices&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
